180 degree rule is technically broken here - I would expect you to have shot over Neil's right shoulder. But it's borderline. If the shot had not included Neil's shoulder and had been a straight-on shot of you, it would be within the rule.
Match-on-action is also not achieved, it is actually a jump cut because there is movement you do not see between the two shots. Did you say you lost that clip?
Let me know if this is clear or you would like to see other examples.
I'll remember the 180-degree rule for next time I film and we lost some of our clips towards the end and beginning of the sequence so the match-on-action was disrupted as we couldn't put it together properly and did it as best as we could with the remaining clips we had.
Well done.
ReplyDelete180 degree rule is technically broken here - I would expect you to have shot over Neil's right shoulder. But it's borderline. If the shot had not included Neil's shoulder and had been a straight-on shot of you, it would be within the rule.
Match-on-action is also not achieved, it is actually a jump cut because there is movement you do not see between the two shots. Did you say you lost that clip?
Let me know if this is clear or you would like to see other examples.
For those reasons this work is at Level 2.
I'll remember the 180-degree rule for next time I film and we lost some of our clips towards the end and beginning of the sequence so the match-on-action was disrupted as we couldn't put it together properly and did it as best as we could with the remaining clips we had.
ReplyDelete